<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Military Law on ExcellentWiki - Legal Encyclopedia</title><link>https://legal.excellentwiki.com/japan/military-law/</link><description>Recent content in Military Law on ExcellentWiki - Legal Encyclopedia</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://legal.excellentwiki.com/japan/military-law/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Military Law in Japan</title><link>https://legal.excellentwiki.com/japan/military-law/japan-military-law/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://legal.excellentwiki.com/japan/military-law/japan-military-law/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="constitutional-framework-article-9"&gt;Constitutional Framework: Article 9&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Japan&amp;rsquo;s military forces are fundamentally shaped by &lt;strong&gt;Article 9&lt;/strong&gt; of the Constitution (1947), which renounces war and prohibits maintaining &amp;ldquo;war potential.&amp;rdquo; Drafted under the Allied Occupation and never amended, Article 9 has been subject to continuous constitutional debate since the establishment of the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) in 1954. The original government interpretation, articulated by the Cabinet Legislation Bureau, held that Article 9 prohibits &amp;ldquo;war potential&amp;rdquo; but permits the &lt;strong&gt;minimum necessary force for self-defence&lt;/strong&gt;. This distinction — between forbidden &amp;ldquo;war potential&amp;rdquo; and permitted &amp;ldquo;self-defence capability&amp;rdquo; — has been criticised as semantically untenable but has provided the SDF&amp;rsquo;s doctrinal foundation for over seven decades.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>