<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Property Law on ExcellentWiki - Legal Encyclopedia</title>
		<link>https://legal.excellentwiki.com/eu/property-law/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Property Law on ExcellentWiki - Legal Encyclopedia</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://legal.excellentwiki.com/eu/property-law/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>EU Property Law</title>
				<link>https://legal.excellentwiki.com/eu/property-law/eu-property-law/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://legal.excellentwiki.com/eu/property-law/eu-property-law/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-protection-of-property-rights-in-the-eu-legal-order&#34;&gt;The Protection of Property Rights in the EU Legal Order&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The European Union does not possess a general legislative competence to harmonise national property law; property rights remain primarily within the competence of the Member States under the principle of conferral. However, the protection of property rights has been recognised as a &lt;strong&gt;general principle of EU law&lt;/strong&gt; and has been given binding force through the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) first recognised the right to property as a general principle in &lt;em&gt;Hauer v. Land Rheinland-Pfalz&lt;/em&gt; (Case 44/79, 1979), holding that the right to property is protected in the Community legal order, but that its exercise may be restricted provided that restrictions correspond to objectives of general interest and do not constitute a disproportionate and intolerable interference with the rights of the owner. The &lt;em&gt;Hauer&lt;/em&gt; formulation — proportionality review of restrictions on property — established the analytical framework applied in subsequent cases including &lt;em&gt;Booker Aquaculture&lt;/em&gt; (Joined Cases C-20/00 and C-64/00), concerning the destruction of fish stocks without compensation, and &lt;em&gt;Kadi&lt;/em&gt; (Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P), concerning the freezing of assets of persons suspected of terrorist involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>EU Property Law — Cross-Border Property Rights and Private International Law</title>
				<link>https://legal.excellentwiki.com/eu/property-law/eu-cross-border-property/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://legal.excellentwiki.com/eu/property-law/eu-cross-border-property/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;The European Union does not possess a substantive &lt;em&gt;ius in rem&lt;/em&gt; comparable to the national property laws of its Member States. Property law remains within the competence of the Member States under the principle of conferral (Article 4 TEU; Article 345 TFEU, which provides that the Treaties &amp;ldquo;shall in no way prejudice the rules in Member States governing the system of property ownership&amp;rdquo;). However, the EU has progressively legislated in the field of &lt;strong&gt;private international law&lt;/strong&gt; (conflict of laws) affecting cross-border property relations, and has adopted harmonised measures in related areas such as succession, matrimonial property, credit, and procedural enforcement.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
