Hustler Magazine v. Falwell

Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court.

Hustler Magazine published a parody advertisement depicting televangelist Jerry Falwell in a lewd and offensive manner. Falwell sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress and won a jury verdict. Hustler appealed, arguing the First Amendment protected the parody as a form of satire and opinion.

Significance

Chief Justice Rehnquist’s unanimous opinion reversed the verdict. The Court held that public figures cannot recover damages for emotional distress caused by parodies or satirical statements unless they prove the statement contains a false statement of fact made with actual malice. The decision protected political satire and parody, recognizing that the First Amendment requires ‘breathing space’ for even offensive humor. Rehnquist noted that ‘political cartoons and satire have a proud tradition in our nation’s history.’

Category

US Federal Case Law